Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

B4790

Butterick 4790 has been voted one of the top patterns to sew this year. PatternReview.com sewers highly recommend this pattern and they aren't alone. This pattern has become very popular and is know as a quick, easy, and beautiful sew. It's been called the most popular pattern ever produced:

In 1952, Butterick Pattern Co experienced a phenomenon it had not known since the 'Garibaldi Suit' of the late 1860's. They released pattern #6015, and dubbed it the 'walk-away' dress, because it was so easy you could "Start it after breakfast... walk-away in it for luncheon!". It's simple yet flattering wrap design and easy construction were what made it so popular.

It may have worked for some people but I thought this pattern was a disaster.

Technically, the idea is very simple and rather clever. It's one long piece of fabric that you pull over your head and the front two pieces hook together around your waist in the back and the back skirt wraps around and hooks in the front. Just like that. Done. It's a very quick sew, so it's also a great pattern for instant gratification... if it happens to fit you.

ButterickFlat

I made this dress for my good friend and daughter's pre-school teacher, Maggie Putnam. Maggie is a beautiful woman and her figure is very slight. She is petite, small busted, and has a slight concave in her upper chest. I cut the size appropriate for her measurements and made adjustments accordingly. Everything was going very smoothly and Maggie was very excited.

Here she is for one of her fittings. I was not pleased with how the bodice was laying on her. I ended up making a solid princess seam from shoulder through center bust point connecting to the existing fitting darts; this gave the bodice a nicer fit. Luckily the pattern is a bit busy, so the seams blended in well. I lowered the neckline a bit as well to open up her chest a bit. It really seemed to come together quite smoothly.

MaggieA

Here is the finished dress:

MaggieDressCrop

Maggie felt so very beautiful in her new dress. She wore it for the pre-kindergarten Valentine's day. I peeked in on her bustling around the children and getting things together during the party and our eyes met. I was completely mortified when I saw the dress and rushed out the door with tears in my eyes. "Why?" you may ask. "It looks simply beautiful! And she looks absolutely adorable in it!"

"Yes," I would concede, "but that's when she is standing completely still."

Sigh. I went home and my mind could not get rid of the picture of Maggie trying to get the food, crafts, and games together with one hand glued to the front panel of her skirt to keep it from riding up dangerously high.
MaggieFrontSkirt
"Well, she should've worn a slip," you might say.
She did wear a slip.
"Well, maybe she wore the wrong slip."
No, she wore the right slip.

So, the question at hand is, "WHAT WENT WRONG? HOW DO I FIX IT?"

So, why was the skirt riding up? Her carefully fitted bodice looked like a baggy mess on her.

MaggieBustA

MaggieBackA

The back was equally ill-fitting. The print on this fabric makes it a bit more difficult to see, but believe me, it's all there. Where on earth are the shoulder seams?

MaggieShoulderSeamClose

This dress calls for 4 3/4 yards of fabric -- most of it being used for the back circle skirt. That is a lot of fabric and a lot of weight back there. Maggie does not have the curvy shape up top to keep the bodice and shoulders in place. All weekend I fretted over ways to fix this problem. I'm a professional! And this is a really easy dress! What is wrong with me??? The worst was when Maggie told me that her fellow co-workers were consoling her during lunch and coming up with solutions for her to fix the dress. How awful! She was embarrassed, very uncomfortable, and felt really sorry for me.

I thought about putting weights in the front of the skirt hem. No good. You shouldn't wash them and how annoying and very impractical to have to take them out every time you wash.

I thought about putting a 1" grow-grain ribbon doubled to make an "inside belt" along the waist for extra stability. What can I do to keep the waist and therefore the shoulder seams in place?

In the end, I did none of those things. I needed to think about Maggie first and I knew how very uncomfortable she was in the dress. She did not feel secure in the garment at all. If I made the belt, it might have been a quick fix that maybe would've worked, but my goal was to make her a dress she felt beautiful and confident in. I ended up taking my big scissors and chopping off the bodice from the circle skirt. It was sad, but the right thing to do. I put a waistband on to finish it. It would still wrap around the waist and fasten in the front.


CircleSkirt

I found another re-printed vintage pattern, Simplicity 3673.

3673

I chose to make her the straight shift to be the base dress under the circle skirt. With this option, she would feel very secure in the garment and still get the look and feel of the old dress. Not only that, but if she wanted to wear the dress alone and be more stream-lined, she could do that as well. Maggie chose a solid red for the straight dress. To keep the design flowing with the previous fabric, I piped the neckline and armscyes in the black and white print and also made a belt out of the print for when she wore it without the overskirt.

The changes I needed to make to this pattern were minimal. I did make a muslin mock-up and I needed to take out some extra-fullness in her upper-chest. Besides that, it was a perfect fit for her. When I saw her face light up, I knew it was the right thing to do. She wore the red dress without the circle-skirt to the end of the year Spring Program. Her husband requested she wear it that way probably because she looked like a little hottie. She looked and felt absolutely beautiful. These are some poor shots from the Spring Program.

(You will notice that the belt has slipped down in the front as well as the back. It is supposed to rest on the seam right under the bust. I noticed this during the program and sewing some quick belt-loops on the side seams should take care of that.)

DressADressB

You maybe would also laugh when I tell you that I was sewing the belt that very morning during the "practice program." Unfortunately, I don't have a picture of the dress with the original over-skirt. I will get some shots this week and amend this post.

IN CONCLUSION: How do you fix the Butterick 4790 "Walk-Away" Dress? I don't have any clear definite answers to give you regarding the pulling and sagging dilemma. After I sewed the dress and encountered the problem I talked to my sister Megan who had also sewn the dress some years ago and had the same exact problem. Hers was a bit worse because she made the dress reversible--twice as much weight in the back! She is small busted as well and never really wore the dress.

It's a problem that hasn't been discussed on the internet so I decided it was time that someone did. I question whether this pattern can really result in a good fit. Many people say they've had success with this pattern...I'm definitely not one of them.

Love, Rachel

AMENDED #1  Kathleen from Nova Scotia emailed me about having this same problem. She has indicated that she would like to try and fix the dress. This amendment could give you some ideas to kick around. 

"WELL, I'M GOING TO FIX IT ANYWAY!" Good for you! If this is the direction you would like to take with this garment, you could try a couple things that might help a bit.

First of all, you really need to make sure that the dress fits perfectly on your body. That means the shoulder seams are exactly in place, bust seams line up perfectly and the most important is that the back waist seam is EXACTLY on your waist as well as the front. Sew a 1" grow-grain ribbon along the front (exactly where it should hit your waist) and fasten it tightly and securely in the back with a solid skirt-hook. They use grow-grain under ballet costumes to keep them secure and in place. I know that you'll see the stitching on the front of the garment--it shouldn't matter since you'll be pulling the back skirt over to the front anyway.

  • NOTE: In sewing the front "inside belt" there will most likely be a part of the belt around the back of the waist that WILL NOT BE ATTACHED TO THE FABRIC. Pay close attention to the curve that wraps around to the back. If you just simply sew the belt onto the fabric, the front skirt will not lay smoothly.

Attach the grow-grain to the back waist as well stitching right in the middle of your seam. The idea behind this is to completely stabilize the waist and try to keep things from moving. Hopefully this will reduce the movement to a minimal.

In addition to this, another thought could be lining just the front part of the dress, while keeping the back unlined to give the front a bit more weight.

I'd love to hear from you on this topic! Did you have any problems? If so, what did you do to fix them?

Love Again, Rachel

AMENDED #2 - A POSSIBLE SOLUTION!

You've made the dress, love the dress, and want to make it work so you'll actually wear it. This could be the solution:

Cut the bottom of the front dress panel at the waist plus 1/2" (for seam allowance). Construct and sew a full pencil skirt and attach the waist to the front original remaining dress panel. You can also put a waistband on. This could be a great solution. The front skirt will not move and be completely stabilized. The weight of the back skirt could actually be a positive by pulling the upper bodice smoothly into place. You can still pull the dress over your head and wrap the back circle skirt around your waist.

Anyone want to make it??? 

pencilskirt

Idea of a pencil skirt you could use.

DressFlatCombinedSmall

Rough sketch of the new flat of the dress with a full pencil skirt with kick pleat.

Love Again Again, Rachel

Print | posted on Saturday, May 24, 2008 11:40 PM

Feedback

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by CAS at 5/26/2008 8:22 AM
Gravatar Rachel, I was so glad to see this post. I too made this dress, having read many glowing reviews about it beforehand. It is indeed easy to make and when I wore it I received many compliments about it's uniqueness and retro-feel. However, I had similar problems to what you describe. I am petite and not well endowed and the weight of the back skirt kept pulling the front down, resulting in my constant tugging and rearranging. I have not yet given up on the dress because I really like the look; I made it in two opposing prints, a black on white for the front and white on black for the back. My idea is to add some buttons or snaps to the sides to keep everything where it should be. I also found that the front skirt, being very straight and wrapping slight around the back, wanted to ride up with any movement, so I am looking for a way to address that issue. I thought of just trimming the sides to they don'the wrap around the back but am a little concerned about "exposure". I look forward to hearing other ideas and solutions. CAS

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Rachel at 5/26/2008 9:59 AM
Gravatar After CAS's comment, I wonder about making a complete pencil skirt with an invisible zipper down the center back and attaching the rest of the original dress to that (appropriately cut off at the waistline in the front of course). The skirt would be solid and you could still stick your head through the dress and wrap the back circle skirt around. The weight of the back skirt in this case could be a plus because it would pull on the bodice and make it smooth as it wraps around, but the solid skirt would definitely not move.
-Rachel

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Elizabeth at 6/12/2008 10:11 PM
Gravatar Hmmm, interesting dilemma. I have this pattern, but have not yet gotten around to making it up yet. Since the problem is that the back half has a heavier skirt than the front half, my solution would be to duplicate the back skirt on the front. The two skirts would be then be equally heavy and balance each other out. The fuller skirt would also assist in coverage if the wind is a bit rambunctious.

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by oldpatterns at 6/16/2008 6:42 AM
Gravatar There are at least 2 other variations of that pattern out there with narrower skirts. maybe that will solve some of your problems with that design.

Butterick 3227

http://www.oldpatterns.com/butterick70.html#3221

Mail Order 4829 & 4847

http://www.oldpatterns.com/fashion.html#4829

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Kristina at 6/23/2008 7:15 PM
Gravatar I too have made this dress, and had a lot of the same problems everyone else has had. I don't think it has anything to do with fit or body shape. I am very busty, and very hour-glassy, and I still had problems. I had to do some major adjustments around the bust line so that the dress wouldn't sag around the arm holes. I did 3 things to help it stop pulling to the back. First, I sewed snaps on to the front and back pieces where they cross under the arms. I also sewed a button to the back waist seam, where the front connects, so that the front pieces connect to the back skirt seam and aren't free floating, and sewed the side with the buttons to the front piece. I realize that this makes the dress less wrap-y than it's intended to be, but I say, whatever works. I think i might be tempted to make it again, this time with a seam across the front waist too, so I can elasticize the waist a little.
I loved your bust solution of making the front darts into front princess seams, and the idea of lining just the front. I wish I'd thought of that. I definitely plan to do both of those things on the next one of these dresses. I'll probably take some of the fullness out of the skirt, too.

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Rachel at 6/23/2008 7:42 PM
Gravatar I'm just loving all of these ideas coming forth! The blogging world is so amazing!

Love, Rachel

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Jennifer at 6/24/2008 7:22 AM
Gravatar I haven't made the dress, though I was considering it. However, it occurs to me that the problem may be with the undergarments worn with the dress, not the dress itself. If you look at the pattern picture, the model (to my eyes) is mostly likely wearing a crinoline, and maybe a girdle as well. Fairly standard-issue undergarments of the 50's, after all. I *think* the crinoline would support the fullness of the skirt so that the whole thing *wouldn't* slip backwards.

The proper undergarments make a *huge* difference in getting the look of any historical stuff - for instance, I don't know if you've seen this? http://sewretro.blogspot.com/2007/10/update-my-petticoat-arrived.html

'Course, my background is in even more historical stuff, not necessarily 50's stuff, so YMMV.

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Rachel at 6/24/2008 9:24 AM
Gravatar I will agree whole-heartedly that undergarments are really important and necessary for a proper fit. I've worked in the theatrical costuming industry for almost ten years and yes, definitely for period costuming and garments it is a must.

However, for this particular piece, I'm inclined to disagree that a petticoat would be the final answer to our problems. In the 1950's you see two dominant skirt styles. The first being the full circle skirt, the second being the straight pencil skirt. You can check out some pictures here: http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Picture/8520/1950s.htm

This dress morphs the two styles of this era. The front of the dress is a very straight sheath with fit and form like our pencil skirt. Putting a crinoline under the dress would most likely support the back circle of the dress, but it would also diminish the existing skimpy front coverage and result in some funky pulling in the front.

I'd be interested in seeing someone experiment with these thoughts! Photos anyone????

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Lena at 8/23/2008 8:01 AM
Gravatar ever since i've seen a picture of this dress i've wanted to sew it, but before purchasing the pattern i read some reviews and now i'm not quite so sure. anyway, as at least part of the problem seems to be the weight of the fabrid and the fact that the front is more towards the pencil-skirt, my question (i'm not such an experienced seamstress) would be: has anybody tried to use the pattern for the backskirt for the front as well? Like this, it would basically be two full circle skirts, giving the front the same weight as the back. i really would love to sew this dress, but after reading about all those problems i got some doubts..

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Rachel at 8/24/2008 10:55 PM
Gravatar Hi Lena! You definitely could try to do the double circle skirt and see how that works out for you. It will be a VERY full skirt, but could be cute. If you decide to do that, check back in with us and send pictures of your final garment!

-Rachel

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Valerie at 9/12/2008 8:39 AM
Gravatar I've never made this dress, but I found this thread whilst looking for a good line drawing of the pattern (I would prefer to create the pattern myself rather than modifying the original).
I was surprised to find that the pattern uses a straight skirt front. Seems like a recipe for disaster, for all of the reasons you've mentioned. The obvious solution, to me, is to cut the front and back with the same fullness ... perhaps less full than the original back, so you don't feel like a circus tent! I'll try it and let you know!

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Lena at 10/27/2008 9:21 AM
Gravatar well, i now made the dress and am actually quite happy with it. i did not use the idea of a full circle skirt for the lower front after all, but i still thought that part of the problem may be lying in the pencil-shaped lower front. so i added a godet (do you call it that?) to the middle of the lower front, thus flaring it. like this, the knees won't push the lower front upwards when walking.

as i am quite short, i shortened the dress (and thus the full circle skirt) by about 16-17cms, so i guess some of the weight went away as well, and the skirt doesn't pull the front down backwards.
you can read some more on my blog here: http://froekenlila.blogspot.com/2008/10/butterick-wraparound-dress.html

i hope i could help a little..

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Random Helper at 11/28/2008 4:34 PM
Gravatar The biggest problem I see with the Walk-Away dress, is that you didn't make the (back, where it connects at the front) like the pattern, or at least not like the picture. It's supposed to be tight on the waist, and button across the panel in the front (instead of just at the corner).

This helps hold the weight of the dress in place, and keep the back from dropping down as much. With only a corner attachment, there's nothing holding the weight in place.

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Elizabeth at 1/1/2009 5:07 PM
Gravatar I found this pattern while trying to find an easy Renaissance-style dress to make for a friend...we are both 'generously endowed', which seems to help hold the waist in place somehow. We lengthened the skirt to her ankles and put eyelets in the front rather than buttons or hooks for the full effect. We did find that making the under-skirt a full circle skirt rather than a straight skirt helped to prevent the back-skirt weight from pulling the bodice down off of her shoulders. I also added a light 'butterfly' sleeve, left open on the bottom, to give the propper chemise/bodice look for the time period. Total time took less than 3 hours and she looks fabulous!!

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by marchsun at 3/4/2009 10:59 AM
Gravatar So glad i came upon this site & read all the valuable advise. Too bad i have already bought the pattern and can't chicken out cuz money is tight and i really need to succeed in this dress to be worn at my daughter's wedding. I have to make it so good, flawless that it looks high-end store bought!!! I'm going to make it long, gown length too. I wonder if I make it a size smaller, that it will fit better/snug?? I also plan to use cloth glue to glue down dimes at the inside of front skirt hem... Need all the advise i can get as the pattern will arrive through the mail any minute now.

Thank you, all. if i do succeed in this big project, i will somehow post a photo of it to let y'all see it.

Share any insight you may further have on this pattern, pleaseeee.

:)

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Jessica at 3/5/2009 1:01 PM
Gravatar Hmm this isn't a petite pattern. And I'm not petite so I didn't have a problem with it. :( My solution/suggestion would have been to take the full skirt up where it connects to the bodice to make it even all around and to adjust the shoulder seam forward because her bust is not full enough to keep the neckline and back held up enough in the front (if that makes sense) Either that or find her a nice stuffed 1950s cone style bra (JUST KIDDING!). Just looks like her bust isn't full enough to keep everything pushed forward and even and her skirt length is too long for the wrap portion.

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Heather at 4/29/2009 11:52 AM
Gravatar Does anyone think that using two different weights of fabric might help in this case? For example, use a heavier twill fabric for the front and a lighter linen as the back? I like the idea of contrasting fabrics and using a darker one for the back to shrink my waist. Yay for optical illusions... :) I could do that with a solid linen and have a funky retro patterned fabric for the front.

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Danica Duensing at 6/28/2009 2:55 PM
Gravatar I just made this dress myself. I had to extrapolate the pattern from a size 22(the largest they had) to a size 30 (the size I wear).

I put some pictures up on my Facebook page if you'd like to see it.

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2030472&id=197402605&l=a3f23ddec1

I did a fair amount of tailoring it, and I'm quite pleased with it. I'm planning on wearing it to Hootenanny this weekend! :)

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by Cheryl Gatling at 8/29/2009 6:50 AM
Gravatar Here is my idea for adding weight to the front skirt-- pockets. Two patch pockets added to the front skirt would not show under the overskirt, and so would not change the lines of the dress. The pockets would add weight in their own right, but you could also stick a little something in them as well. That would solve the problem of removing weights every time the dress was washed.

My teenage daughter asked me to sew this dress for her, and I am in the process of sewing and fitting. Don't know how it will come out.

# re: Sewing Butterick 4790 Walk-Away Dress - Don't Waste Your Time!

Left by jen at 2/3/2010 1:04 AM
Gravatar i have made this dress and have had the same problem. i had to alter the pattern so much to make it look right but after wearing it, it ended up looking baggy and unflattering. actually, i just got rid of it!

after having made other dresses from vintage patterns, i realized this dress wasn't necessarily faster to make, better looking or easier than any other i've made. i say skip it!

Your comment:





 
Please add 7 and 3 and type the answer here:

Copyright © Rachel

Design by Bartosz Brzezinski

Design by Phil Haack Based On A Design By Bartosz Brzezinski